Plan Information
| Term | Definition of Term | Database entry |
| Plan Region | Regional scope of plan | Chesapeake Foodshed Region |
| Publication Date | Year that plan was originally published | 2020 |
| Plan Title | Formal title of the published plan/document | Blueprint for Community Ownership, Empowerment, and Prosperity (COEP) in the Chesapeake Foodshed |
| Webpage | If applicable, webpage associated with the plan/planning project | Broken link: http://www.chesapeakefoodshed.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/COEP-Final-Report-Updated.pdf? Press release/newsletter announcement about the plan: https://mailchi.mp/chesapeakefoodshed/the-hive-resources-for-food-system-changemakers-5027094?fbclid=IwAR3ZsUAXvb0dk7-EYM99AxGiU4HlvR0rxJcJfBsx-GvKGuJwlhUq6KERvp4 |
| Authors | Listed author(s) of the plan, and descriptions as applicable | COEP Action Team (comprised of 12 food system disruptors: farmers, farm-workers, food system strategists, immigrants, birthworkers, historians and afrofuturists) |
| Author Type | Category types: [Partnership; University; Government; Non-profit; Network; Food Policy Council] | Network |
| Region Type | [Inter-state; State; City: County] | Inter-state Region |
| Funding Sources | [Foundations, State Government; Municipal Government; Federal Government; Individual Donors; State University; Private University; Non-profit organizations/entities; Unspecified] | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Funders | Compiled list of funders | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Total Funding | Total amount of funding | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Plan Goals | Overarching goals of the plan/recommendations | To present a roadmap that will spark dialogue to those in power so they can “assess the ways in which your personal and organizational culture supports or hinders the equitable distribution of assets and resources.” |
| Intended Audience | Who is this plan written for? | “Designed for all engaged in food and land justice and sovereignty, but especially for those who hold resources and power to support systemic transformation” |
| Plan Recommendation Structure | Overview of how recommendations are structured within the written document,, i.e.: “5 goals, each with strategies and sub-recommendations”, etc. | 6 key recommendations? (Pulled from press release/email newsletter)Sub-recommendations? |
| Catalyst for Plan | Any important events that led to the creation of the plan, its funding, etc. | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Creation Process | The process by which this document was created, including Stakeholder Engagement Strategy. | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Theoretical Framework | [Collective Impact Framework; Transformative Scenario Planning; Human Centered Design; Design Thinking; Systems Thinking; Other; N/A] | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Theoretical Framework: Literature | If included, what literature did the report use as a theoretical framework? | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Development Timeline | Length of time it took for the plan to be created and published. | 2 years |
| Implementation Strategy | Articulated strategies used to implement the recommendations. | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Implementation Timeline | Recommended length of time for plan to be implemented by. | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Evaluation Strategy | Established strategy for monitoring and evaluating plan implementation post-publication. | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |
| Supplemental Documents (to be attached within the AirTable) | Supplemental documents that were published by the FSP group or corresponding organizations, and/or any document that provided background information and research to inform the analyzed plan. | May be specified in plan (plan no longer online) |